| The Complaint Shop All Your Complaints under one Roof |
|
|
Last update 17/10/2007 |
|||
|
I have just returned from a short holiday on the Costa de la Luz in Spain and I have come across a rather nasty scam used by Europcar at their depot at FARO airport. It may well be possible that this is common practise all across Portugal but I can only comment on my case with specific reference to FARO.
The car was pre-booked with Thomson’s at what seemed a very reasonable rate of £75.00 for seven days. In line with all other car rental firms across Europe I obviously, and wrongly, assumed that this would be an all inclusive rate with nothing further to pay except fuel.
I was wrong and when I went to collect my car I was quoted a rather high excess charge in case of damage which I could eliminate by taking out an ‘excess reduction cover’ at a cost of 7.20 Euros per day for the smallest car in group A which, when added VAT at 19% adds a staggering Euro 59.98 [ £ 42.85 ] to the hire price, an incredible 57%.
And it does not stop there. All over the office and the counter at their FARO depot are notices offering a 10% discount on petrol if the car is returned empty accentuating that this option would reduce the return check-in time and the transfer to the airport. Whilst I was there nearly everyone took up both these options in the believe that this would be beneficial.
It was not until I re-read the rental agreement later in my hotel when I realised how this scam actually works. You pick up the car with a full tank and irrespective of the petrol in the tank upon your return you are then charged for a full tank as per manufacturer’s specification. Furthermore you are charged a higher price than the petrol stations charge and you forfeit any petrol left in your tank upon your return. [ Petrol station price 97 cents – Europcar petrol price 104 cents = 7.5% surcharge]
They are clearly aware that it is virtually impossible to return a car with an empty tank and so gain all the petrol left by their customers.
And to crown it all – they never deducted the 10% they offered initially to entice you to take up this option. |
|
So please, if you have booked a car with Thomson or anyone else and it turns out to be from Europcar be very careful and most certainly do not take up their empty tank option. Bring your car back full and save yourselves some money or better still, check out the car hire conditions in the small print at the end of the brochure before you book your car. The hidden costs are still lurking around the corner. Be warned. |
|
We will be taking up this matter with Thomson as Europcar are their recommended Car Hire Partners, in the hope to stamp out this deliberate scam and hopefully be more detailed about the hidden charges which are not immediately obvious and we will also be contacting Europcar in Portugal to ask them what happened to the 10 % discount they promised in the first instance to entice their clients to take up this empty tank option which works entirely in their favour and is of no benefit to the hirer.
UPDATE 23rd December 2003 Europcar in Portugal have replied on the 17th December 2003 and have apologised for the overcharge and agreed to refund an amount of Euro 8.00 back to the original credit card.
|
|
DAFI/CLI-RF/st-3988 17.12.03 Ref: Rental Agreement N° 7009281743 Dear Sir, We acknowledge receive your complaint dated November 13, which we gave our most attention and please accept our apology for all inconveniences caused. We sincerely regret the inconveniences you have been caused in being charged for a higher amount to the one previous informed. We are obviously very concerned that our standard of service didn’t meet your requirements. Your comments have been forward to the concerned manager at this time and the decision received was the 10% applying. In a few days you will be able to confirm through your Visa credit card statement, the credit in the amount of € 8.00. We appreciate you taking the time to let us know about the problem you had renting with EURQPCAR and we hope that the action we’ve taken will enable you Sir to use our services in the future. Yours faithfully, ROSA FERNANDES CUSTOMER SERVICES MANAGER |
|
UPDATE 22nd January 2004 |
| Nearly 8 weeks after we had written to Thomson they finally replied stating that the 'excess waiver charge' is an optional extra, which is offered by all insurance companies and although an advantage, is not necessarily required. The letter then rambled on and lost itself explaining that they work with multi-national car companies and that they, Thomson, expect a very high standard of hire for their customers, something you may not get if you hire a car locally, which they admit might actually be cheaper, if you take the risk, as the local firms may use older cars or maintain these vehicles to different standards. Once again it seems that they did not read our complaint properly as we never queried the optional insurance. What we queried was the amount of this insurance, an incredible 57% of the actual hire price and the fact that the excess charges without this insurance are substantially higher with Europcar than with other car hire companies. Thomson did not elaborate on these queries and as we had not asked Thomson for a reduction or refund, this case is now closed. Let's only hope they actually do what they say and let's conclude it in Thomson's own words: |
|
Only by listening to our customers can we
effectively monitor our many different products and be aware of any improvements required
|
| Complaint Status: Closed |
| This website also links to another complaint during the same holiday with Thomson Thomson [RIU Rio Atlantico - Isla Canila] and to Europcar (UK) Europcar (France) | Overall Efficiency |
|
|
| Respond Time |
|
||
| Final Outcome |
|
||
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
|